Steinhaus–Moser notation

In mathematics, SteinhausMoser notation is a means of expressing certain extremely large numbers. It is an extension of Steinhaus’s polygon notation.

Contents

Definitions

a number n in a triangle means nn.
a number n in a square is equivalent with "the number n inside n triangles, which are all nested."
a number n in a pentagon is equivalent with "the number n inside n squares, which are all nested."

etc.: n written in an (m + 1)-sided polygon is equivalent with "the number n inside n nested m-sided polygons". In a series of nested polygons, they are associated inward. The number n inside two triangles is equivalent to nn inside one triangle, which is equivalent to nn raised to the power of nn.

Steinhaus only defined the triangle, the square, and a circle , equivalent to the pentagon defined above.

Special values

Steinhaus defined:

Moser’s number is the number represented by "2 in a megagon", where a megagon is a polygon with "mega" sides.

Alternative notations:

and

Mega

A mega, ②, is already a very large number, since ② = square(square(2)) = square(triangle(triangle(2))) = square(triangle(22)) = square(triangle(4)) = square(44) = square(256) = triangle(triangle(triangle(...triangle(256)...))) [256 triangles] = triangle(triangle(triangle(...triangle(256256)...))) [255 triangles] = triangle(triangle(triangle(...triangle(3.2 × 10616)...))) [255 triangles] = ...

Using the other notation:

mega = M(2,1,5) = M(256,256,3)

With the function f(x)=x^x we have mega = f^{256}(256)  = f^{258}(2) where the superscript denotes a functional power, not a numerical power.

We have (note the convention that powers are evaluated from right to left):

Similarly:

etc.

Thus:

Rounding more crudely (replacing the 257 at the end by 256), we get mega ≈ 256\uparrow\uparrow 257, using Knuth's up-arrow notation.

After the first few steps the value of n^n is each time approximately equal to 256^n. In fact, it is even approximately equal to 10^n (see also approximate arithmetic for very large numbers). Using base 10 powers we get:

...

Moser's number

It has been proven that in Conway chained arrow notation,

\mathrm{moser} < 3\rightarrow 3\rightarrow 4\rightarrow 2,

and, in Knuth's up-arrow notation,

\mathrm{moser} < f(f(f(4))), \text{ where } f(n) = 3 \uparrow^n 3.

Therefore Moser's number, although incomprehensibly large, is vanishingly small compared to Graham's number:

\mathrm{moser} \ll  3\rightarrow 3\rightarrow 64\rightarrow 2 < f^{64}(4) = \text{Graham}'\text{s number}.

See also

External links